[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15494561#comment-15494561
 ] 

John Burwell commented on CLOUDSTACK-4918:
------------------------------------------

[~muralireddy] is this bug still an issue after the 4.6 VR refactoring? 

> VR can not be LB service provider without requiring to be source nat service 
> provider as well.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-4918
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-4918
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Bug
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: Network Controller
>    Affects Versions: 4.2.0, 4.3.0
>            Reporter: Murali Reddy
>            Assignee: Murali Reddy
>             Fix For: Future
>
>
> VR currently can not be LB service provider without requiring to be source 
> nat service provider as well. It fails with error "Provider VirtualRouter 
> doesn't support services combination: [Dns, Dhcp, Lb] ". This is a 
> restriction made sense prior to network-as-a-service (earlier releases to 
> 3.0). VR at that time was sole provider of all the services. Now with ability 
> to choose different service providers for different services, its valid 
> service and provider combination to have source nat service provided by 
> different provider than VR, and LB service is provided by VR.  Currently this 
> combination is prevented while creating network offering.
> This bug is to relax this restriction.
> Its possible that, this may be non-trivial bug to fix. VR implicitly acquires 
> a public IP for source nat and created public NIC on the VR by default. In 
> the above mentioned case, only on acquiring IP for LB, Ip is associated with 
> the VR so requiring that public interface is created on the VR.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to