[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9652?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15752193#comment-15752193
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9652:
--------------------------------------------

Github user marcaurele commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1832
  
    @karuturi Ok thanks for the clarifications, and it's the scenario I thought 
about too. That being said, I'm currently thinking of a new approach for the 
command sequencer because having implemented the live migration, the 
non-parallel commands isn't optimal at all when you have long running 
sequential commands on a hypervisor. And I tend to think that's the reason 
behind your PR, isn't it? The way it's currently done is too simple (if a job 
cannot be run in parallel on the HV, it will put in a queue any other coming 
job that needs to run on this same HV). IMO this sequencing should take into 
account what kind of job is coming and for which type of resources. For example 
a security group update, a VM start and a migration for different VMs should be 
able to run in parallel because they are unrelated. With today design, it isn't 
possible.
    
    So don't you think we're better of rewriting the sequencer to let more 
commands being executed in parallel to avoid this bottleneck on the 
AgentAttache? It would normally make the cancellation not needed in the way you 
implemented it since less jobs will be queued.
    
    If we wish to be able to cancel a job, IMHO it should cancel the job down 
on the hypervisor too, thus clearing normally the resources involved as if the 
execution didn't go well.
    
    Otherwise, the way you implemented it. I would not let a job being cancel 
if it has been sent to the hypervisor to clearly return to the user that it 
wasn't cancelable anymore (you're too late! -> seq number isn't in `_requests` 
anymore so it has been sent to the HV). I'm putting more comment in the code.
    
    What do you think?


> Job framework - Cancelling async jobs
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9652
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9652
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: Management Server
>            Reporter: Rajani Karuturi
>            Assignee: Rajani Karuturi
>
> enable cancellation of long running or subsequent queued up async jobs



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to