Marc Streeter created CLOUDSTACK-9744:
-----------------------------------------

             Summary: listVirtualMachine with 'ids' field fails with invalid 
virtual machine id
                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9744
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9744
             Project: CloudStack
          Issue Type: Bug
      Security Level: Public (Anyone can view this level - this is the default.)
          Components: XenServer
    Affects Versions: 4.4.3, 4.4.0
            Reporter: Marc Streeter


[List Virtual 
Machines](http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.4/root_admin/listVirtualMachines.html)
 offers the ability to list a batch of virtual machines by using the `ids` 
parameter (using comma separated virtual machine id's).  Like so:

{code}
http://<CLOUDSTACK_HOST>/client/api?apiKey=<API_KEY>&pagesize=100&ids=835bddd8-c9d2-45ea-bf26-851a880cd142%2C5763503e-b964-4f96-bc03-2ce1cf58133b%2Cbbc739dd-e3f2-4806-94ba-dc6015e06601%2C3dcb1b2c-c370-4367-8a88-4c768b148e48%2C2738999f-c7d1-42b5-8805-41f87d648478%2C0888b622-5036-4d3c-a3d6-98d22cb4e70c%2Ccd15de56-07e7-4fd5-ad35-83d38fdd5b47&page=1&command=listVirtualMachines&signature=<SIGNATURE>&response=json&listall=true
{code}

When all `ids` provided are valid and currently-present uuid's the result 
provides all requested virtual machines.  If one of the id's presented is 
nonexistent in the  current CloudStack installation (whether it existed once or 
never existed) it results in a HTTP 431 error and no results are returned (even 
 if valid id's accompany invalid id(s)).

Note -- it seems that if an invalidly formed virtual machine id is presented 
(i.e. one that does not exhibit uuid formatting, such as 'foo' or 'bar') then 
only the  valid uuid's presented result in rows returned.


It would be desirable that if an old/nonexistent vm id is presented in the list 
of other vm ids then (whether it's a validly formatted uuid or not) it would 
result in rows only for valid id's presented.  There would be no error for 
invalid UUID's just no corresponding row.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

Reply via email to