[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-964?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Daan Hoogland closed CLOUDSTACK-964.
------------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
> fix python module naming
> ------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-964
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-964
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Noa Resare
> Priority: Minor
>
> There are two toplevel python modules that is part of cloudstack, named
> 'coud_utils' and 'cloudutils' respectively. This seems very much like an
> artifact of the development of the project rather than actual design.
> I propose we make things a bit more straightforward by putting all modules
> into a single namespace with a name easily derived from the project name,
> such as 'cloudstack', and update import statements accordingly.
> So, is this an incompatible change to a published API or not? I would claim
> it is not, and the fact that the python modules gets installed into the
> system python path by default is just a side effect of people doing packaging
> not being up to date on how private python packaging is normally done in
> Debian.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
