[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15863450#comment-15863450
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9117:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Commit 8efdcfc1cdbda9d0a90c701e83a525c64d613e03 in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/master from [~rajanik]
[ https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=8efdcfc ]

Merge pull request #1183 from sanju1010/tcpports

Marvin test to verify that adding TCP ports 500,4500 and 1701 in vpn should not 
failPlease refer to JIRA ticket for more details
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9117

Following is the result info:
Test to add TCP Port Forwarding rule for specific ports(500,1701 and 4500) in 
VPN ... === TestName: test_08_add_TCP_PF_Rule_In_VPN | Status : SUCCESS ===
ok

---

Ran 1 test in 166.799s

OK

* pr/1183:
  Marvin test to verify that adding TCP ports 500,4500 and 1701 in vpn should 
not fail Bug-Id: CS-43653 Reviewed-by: Self

Signed-off-by: Rajani Karuturi <[email protected]>


> Add marvin test to verify adding some TCP ports in vpn won't fail
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9117
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9117
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Test
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>            Reporter: Sanjeev N
>            Assignee: Sanjeev N
>
> Add marvin test to verify adding some TCP ports in vpn won't fail
> Steps to follow:
> ============
> In an advanced zone
> 1.Create Remote access vpn on SourceNAT IP address
> 2.Create PortForwarding rules on the same ip address with TCP ports 500,4500 
> and 1701.
> This is to make sure that VPN ports (UDP ports 500,4500 and 1701) won't give 
> conflict when configuring PF with TCP ports.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to