[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15880252#comment-15880252
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-8239:
--------------------------------------------
Github user wido commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1955#discussion_r102687170
--- Diff:
plugins/hypervisors/kvm/src/com/cloud/hypervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java
---
@@ -2216,6 +2225,8 @@ public int compare(final DiskTO arg0, final DiskTO
arg1) {
disk.setCacheMode(DiskDef.DiskCacheMode.valueOf(volumeObjectTO.getCacheMode().toString().toUpperCase()));
}
}
+
+ s_logger.debug("Adding disk: " + disk.toString());
--- End diff --
Same here, please include the name of the VM
Also, do we really need all these logging lines?
> Add support for VirtIO-SCSI for KVM hypervisors
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-8239
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-8239
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: KVM, Storage Controller
> Affects Versions: 4.6.0
> Environment: KVM
> Reporter: Andrei Mikhailovsky
> Assignee: Wido den Hollander
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: ceph, gsoc2017, kvm, libvirt, rbd, storage_drivers,
> virtio
> Fix For: Future
>
>
> It would be nice to have support for virtio-scsi for KVM hypervisors.
> The reason for using virtio-scsi instead of virtio-blk would be increasing
> the number of devices you can attach to a vm, have ability to use discard and
> reclaim unused blocks from the backend storage like ceph rbd. There are also
> talks about having a greater performance advantage as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
