[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9779?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15885644#comment-15885644
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9779:
--------------------------------------------
Github user niteshsarda commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1972#discussion_r103190716
--- Diff: engine/schema/src/com/cloud/network/dao/LoadBalancerDao.java ---
@@ -29,4 +30,6 @@
List<LoadBalancerVO> listInTransitionStateByNetworkIdAndScheme(long
networkId, Scheme scheme);
+ boolean isLoadBalancerRulesMappedToVmGuestIp(long instanceId, String
instanceIp, long networkId, FirewallRule.Purpose purpose);
--- End diff --
@SudharmaJain : As per suggestion, removed Purpose parameter from method
signature and added directly in the SearchBuilder.
Please check.
> Releasing secondary guest IP fails with error VM nic Ip x.x.x.x is mapped to
> load balancing rule
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9779
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9779
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Bug
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Components: Management Server
> Reporter: Nitesh Sarda
>
> ISSUE
> =================
> Releasing secondary guest IP fails with error VM nic Ip x.x.x.x is mapped to
> load balancing rule
> REPRO STEPS
> ==================
> 1. Create two isolated guest networks with same CIDR
> 2. Deploy VMs on both networks
> 3. Acquire secondary IP on NICs of both VMs and make sure they have the same
> value, user can input the IP address.
> 4. Configure Loadbalancing rule on one of the secondary IP address and try
> releasing the other secondary IP address.
> 5. The operation would fail
> EXPECTED BEHAVIOR
> ==================
> Secondary IP address should be released if there are no LB rules associated
> with it.
> ACTUAL BEHAVIOR
> ==================
> Releasing secondary IP address even if there are no LB rules associated with
> it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
