[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9408?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15930091#comment-15930091
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9408:
--------------------------------------------

Github user rafaelweingartner commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1582#discussion_r106670299
  
    --- Diff: 
api/src/org/apache/cloudstack/api/response/AutoScaleVmProfileResponse.java ---
    @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@
         @Parameter(name = ApiConstants.CS_URL,
                    type = CommandType.STRING,
                    description = "the API URL including port of the CloudStack 
Management Server example: http://server.cloud.com:8080/client/api?";)
    +    // leaving cloud.com reference above as it serves only as an example
    --- End diff --
    
    I agree that it is out of the scope. I just wanted to ask about the idea of 
starting using notations instead of real URLs as examples.
    
    To tell you the truth I have already seen so many time people not thinking 
while seeing examples like this and using a copy/paste working mode that I try 
to avoid it sometimes, just to force people to change the parameters.
    
    It is nothing that you need to change, I just so it, and I wanted to check 
your opinion ;)


> remove runtime references to http://download.cloud.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9408
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9408
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>    Affects Versions: 4.5.2, 4.6.2, 4.7.1, 4.8.0, 4.9.0
>            Reporter: Daan Hoogland
>            Assignee: Daan Hoogland
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> As cloud.com was bought and sold, We have no assurance and can give none to 
> our users as to wether downloads from that site will remain possible. This is 
> to investigate what occurances of cloud.com can remain and which need to 
> change, and change them.
> [~chiradeep][~widodh] I am assigning this to me but am going to ask for some 
> further assistance.
> [~wstevens]I got no pushback so I am marking this as blocker for now.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)

Reply via email to