[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15966299#comment-15966299
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9782:
--------------------------------------------
Github user serverchief commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/1960
Hi @koushik-das
I believe you missed a discussion on this a while back - when this was
initially proposed and we were gathering community feedback.
please read this thread http://markmail.org/message/dtsfb6crbtqx3xut
It will explain why we are choosing this solution and how current VM HA in
production is not meeting the needs.
Thanks
-ilya
PS: we also gave community ample of opportunity to respond to our FS, this
was almost 2 years in the making..
> Host HA
> -------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9782
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9782
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Rohit Yadav
> Assignee: Rohit Yadav
> Fix For: Future, 4.11.0.0
>
>
> CloudStack lacks a way to reliably fence a host, the idea of the host-ha
> feature is to provide a general purpose HA framework and implementation
> specific for hypervisor that can use additional mechanism such as OOBM (ipmi
> based power management) to reliably investigate, recover and fencing a host.
> This feature can handle scenarios associated with server crash issues and
> reliable fencing of hosts and HA of VM.
> FS: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Host+HA
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)
