[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9450?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16256700#comment-16256700
 ] 

ASF subversion and git services commented on CLOUDSTACK-9450:
-------------------------------------------------------------

Commit 14ab69e19a51886b91d77d01eed96de05eb21393 in cloudstack's branch 
refs/heads/debian9-systemvmtemplate from [~fmaximus]
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cloudstack.git;h=14ab69e ]

Merge pull request #2005 from nuagenetworks/feature/nw_offering_for_vpc

CLOUDSTACK-9450: Network Offering for VPC based on DB flag

> Network Offering for VPC based on DB flag
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CLOUDSTACK-9450
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9450
>             Project: CloudStack
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>      Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the 
> default.) 
>          Components: Management Server, UI
>    Affects Versions: 4.9.0
>            Reporter: Frank Maximus
>            Assignee: Frank Maximus
>
> In the NuageVsp provider, based on the review comments, we don't have a 
> separate Provider for VPC.
> This means that it's impossible to determine if a network offering is for VPC 
> or not, purely based on inspection of the services and providers.
> To be able to support Network Offerings for VPC that are not using any 
> service provided by a VPC specific provider like VpcVirtualRouter,
> we would like to store this information as part of the offering.
> As the response of createNetworkOffering already has a forvpc attribute we 
> use the same attribute as part of the request,
> and store the value in the database.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to