[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9114?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16467293#comment-16467293
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on CLOUDSTACK-9114:
--------------------------------------------
rafaelweingartner commented on a change in pull request #2508: CLOUDSTACK-9114:
Reduce VR downtime during network restart
URL: https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/2508#discussion_r186699812
##########
File path: server/src/com/cloud/network/element/VirtualRouterElement.java
##########
@@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ public boolean implement(final Network network, final
NetworkOffering offering,
final List<DomainRouterVO> routers =
routerDeploymentDefinition.deployVirtualRouter();
int routerCounts = 1;
Review comment:
Instead of `routerCounts`, what about `expectedNumberRouter` or something
similar. This is the number of VRs you expect to have in a network, right?
----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
us...@infra.apache.org
> restartnetwork with cleanup should not update/restart both routers at once
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CLOUDSTACK-9114
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-9114
> Project: CloudStack
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: Public(Anyone can view this level - this is the
> default.)
> Reporter: Wei Zhou
> Assignee: Wei Zhou
> Priority: Major
>
> for now, restartnetwork with cleanup will stop both RVRs at first, then start
> two new RVRs.
> to reduce the downtime of network, we'd better restart the RVRs one by one.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
