My assumption is that generics is an experimental branch, and that 4.0 will
happen when 3.x issues are exhausted. ie) 4.0 is way off there in the future
somewhere, and if the generics experiment is complete before 4.0 starts,
then they'll be the same.

If generics isn't experimental, but is definitely the next thing, then no
need for a 4.0.. or rather generics is 4.0 is generics.

Hen

On 8/15/07, Stephen Kestle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Shouldn't version 4.0 be the same as generics?  Perhaps if this (1) issue
> is moved, and we rename generics to 4.0-generics
>
> Cheers
>
> Stephen
>
> Henri Yandell (JIRA) wrote:
>
>      [ 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-223?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>  ]  Henri Yandell updated COLLECTIONS-223: 
> --------------------------------------      Fix Version/s: 4.0  Would be very 
> nice; but a definite backwards compat issue. Marking as 4.0.  I suspect the 
> backwards compat pain outweighs the usefulness of having this.
>
> CollectionUtils.addAll() methods should return the input collection 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------           
>        Key: COLLECTIONS-223                 URL: 
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-223             Project: 
> Commons Collections          Issue Type: Improvement          Components: 
> Collection    Affects Versions: 3.2            Reporter: Vasily Ivanov        
>     Priority: Minor             Fix For: 4.0   Like MapUtils.putAll() method 
> returns input map, CollectionUtils.addAll() methods should return the input 
> collection. This will allow to init and populate collection at the same line: 
> ArrayList inputs = (ArrayList) CollectionUtils.addAll(new ArrayList(), new 
> String[] { "value1", "value2" });
>
>
> --
> ------------------------------
> * <http://www.orionhealth.com>*
>
> *Stephen Kestle Software Engineer*
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> P: +64 9 638 0619
> M: +64 27 453 7853
> F: +64 9 638 0699
> S: skestle
> www.orionhealth.com
>
> This e-mail and any attachments are intended only for the person to whom
> it is addressed and may contain privileged, proprietary, or other data
> protected from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee
> or the person responsible for delivering this to the addressee you are
> hereby notified that reading, copying or distributing this transmission is
> prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please telephone us
> immediately and remove all copies of it from your system. Thank you for your
> co-operation.
>

Reply via email to