[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-145?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549184
]
Stephen Kestle commented on IO-145:
-----------------------------------
Yeah, I could go either way on that. There's not necessarily a "need" to have
a ReverseFileComparator at all (hence no dependency on collections), but it's
probably useful for completeness.
I'd put a note about the availability of the general ReverseComparator in
collections in the javadoc.
Also note that collections is quite likely to shrink, and revive the
commons-functors package.
> File Comparator implementations
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: IO-145
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-145
> Project: Commons IO
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Affects Versions: 1.3.2
> Reporter: Niall Pemberton
> Assignee: Niall Pemberton
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: AFTER-1.4
>
> Attachments: DefaultFileComparator.java,
> LastModifiedFileComparator.java, LengthFileComparator.java,
> NameFileComparator.java, PathFileComparator.java, ReverseFileComparator.java,
> SuffixFileComparator.java
>
>
> Add file comparator implementations - prompted by IO-142
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
