[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-25?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sebb updated COMMONSSITE-25:
----------------------------
Description:
The page
http://commons.apache.org/license.html
displays incorrectly as a single column rather than as left hand navigation
with content on the right.
The HTML Title says: "Commons Build Plugin - Project License" which looks wrong.
The Overview says:
"Typically the licenses listed for the project are that of the project itself,
and not of dependencies."
which does not seem very helpful - how does one distinguish the atypical cases?
Anyway, surely ALL commons code is released under the AL license (1.0 or 2.0).
Also, why have a separate copy of the license? Surely it would be better to
link to the ASF version at:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/
was:
The page
http://commons.apache.org/license.html
displays incorrectly as a single column rather than as left hand navigation
with content on the right.
The HTML Title says: "Commons Build Plugin - Project License" which looks wrong.
The Overview says:
"Typically the licenses listed for the project are that of the project itself,
and not of dependencies."
which does not seem very helpful - how does one distinguish the atypical cases?
Anyway, surely ALL commons code is released under the AL license (1.0 or 2.0).
Also, why have a separate copy of the license? Surely it would be better to
link to the ASF version at:
> http://commons.apache.org/license.html problems
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COMMONSSITE-25
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMMONSSITE-25
> Project: Commons All
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Site
> Reporter: Sebb
>
> The page
> http://commons.apache.org/license.html
> displays incorrectly as a single column rather than as left hand navigation
> with content on the right.
> The HTML Title says: "Commons Build Plugin - Project License" which looks
> wrong.
> The Overview says:
> "Typically the licenses listed for the project are that of the project
> itself, and not of dependencies."
> which does not seem very helpful - how does one distinguish the atypical
> cases?
> Anyway, surely ALL commons code is released under the AL license (1.0 or 2.0).
> Also, why have a separate copy of the license? Surely it would be better to
> link to the ASF version at:
> http://www.apache.org/licenses/
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.