[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-317?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Olivier Vierlinck closed CONFIGURATION-317.
-------------------------------------------

    Resolution: Won't Fix

no easy solution from commons-config - Root cause comes from a known bug of mvn 
assembly

> Version conflict on dependence for commons-collections
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CONFIGURATION-317
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-317
>             Project: Commons Configuration
>          Issue Type: Wish
>          Components: Build
>    Affects Versions: 1.4, 1.5
>         Environment: Seen on Windows XP but should be platform independant
>            Reporter: Olivier Vierlinck
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Based on the pom.xml files:
> commons config (1.4 and 1.5) depends on commons colletions ** 3.2 **  and on 
> commons-beanutils 1.7
> Unfortunately commons-beanutils 1.7depends on commons-collection ** 2.0 **
> I know this kind of jar version clash is not unusual with java/Maven. I know 
> also we can fix it with <dependencyManagement> instruction in maven.
> However, i experienced trouble when using the assembly:assembly project, 
> which does not seem to take into account my <dependencyManagement>.
> But as all these project are coming from apache-commons, I think it would be 
> nice if they all fit together, with a coherent version choice. Probably just 
> uprading beanutils so that it depends on commons-collection 3.2 would work 
> and solve this (I didn't test that)
> i consider this issue as a general comment on common, to have better version 
> management, possibly using ranges (for example if beanutils has been tested 
> succesfully with commons-collections from 2.0 to 3.2)
> What do you think?
> Cheers and thanks for all the work and tools you gave us
> Olivier

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to