[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12747993#action_12747993
]
Benjamin McCann edited comment on MATH-290 at 8/26/09 8:50 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
You originally wrote >= in the constraint and now you're writing <=. Perhaps
that's where the confusion is? The answer is 0 when you use <=.
was (Author: bmccann):
You originally wrote >= in the constraint and now you're writing <=.
Perhaps that's where the confusion is? The answer is 0 when you use <-/
> NullPointerException in SimplexTableau.initialize
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-290
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-290
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Environment: Java 1.6.0_13 on Windows XP 32-bit
> Reporter: Andrea
> Attachments: SimplexSolverTest.patch, SimplexTableau.patch
>
>
> SimplexTableau throws a NullPointerException when no solution can be found
> instead of a NoFeasibleSolutionException
> Here is the code that causes the NullPointerException:
> LinearObjectiveFunction f = new LinearObjectiveFunction(new double[] { 1, 5
> }, 0 );
> Collection<LinearConstraint> constraints = new ArrayList<LinearConstraint>();
> constraints.add(new LinearConstraint(new double[] { 2, 0 }, Relationship.GEQ,
> -1.0));
> RealPointValuePair solution = new SimplexSolver().optimize(f, constraints,
> GoalType.MINIMIZE, true);
> Note: Tested both with Apache Commons Math 2.0 release and SVN trunk
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
