[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1536?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353310#comment-17353310
 ] 

Gilles Sadowski edited comment on MATH-1536 at 5/28/21, 12:58 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------

>> false claim [...]
>
> yes [...]

Then, would you please file a specific JIRA report?

>> One cannot rely on the NormalizedRandomGenerator interface.
>
> No. But that is why the library should at least provide some
> implementations that are correct for other functionality that
> relies on it.

Maybe I'm missing something but I don't think that the library _should_ do that.
 In a previous comment I suggested that we _document_ the requirements: 
Functionality (in this instance: class {{CorrelatedRandomVectorGenerator}}) 
*assumes* that the input is normalized (for the intended behaviour).

Interface {{NormalizedRandomGenerator}} supplies a false sense of security. If 
we want to ensure normalization, the input should be a 
[distribution|http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-statistics/commons-statistics-distribution/apidocs/org/apache/commons/statistics/distribution/ContinuousDistribution.html]
 whose mean and variance can be checked.


was (Author: erans):
{quote}{quote}false claim [...]
{quote}
yes [...]
{quote}
Then, would you please file a specific JIRA report?
{quote}{quote}One cannot rely on the NormalizedRandomGenerator interface.
{quote}
No. But that is why the library should at least provide some implementations 
that are correct for other functionality that relies on it. It has 
GaussianRandomGenerator and UniformRandomGenerator.
{quote}
Maybe I'm missing something but I don't think that the library _should_ do that.
 In a previous comment I suggested that we _document_ the requirements: 
Functionality (in this instance: class {{CorrelatedRandomVectorGenerator}}) 
*assumes* that the input is normalized (for the intended behaviour).

Interface {{NormalizedRandomGenerator}} supplies a false sense of security. If 
we want to ensure normalization, the input should be a 
[distribution|http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-statistics/commons-statistics-distribution/apidocs/org/apache/commons/statistics/distribution/ContinuousDistribution.html]
 whose mean and variance can be checked.

> Sensitivity to RNG (unit tests)
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-1536
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1536
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Task
>            Reporter: Gilles Sadowski
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: rng, unit-test
>             Fix For: 4.0
>
>
> Several unit tests fail when upgrading to version 1.3 of "Commons RNG":
> {noformat}
> [ERROR] Failures: 
> [ERROR]   LogitTest.testDerivativesWithInverseFunction:195 maxOrder = 2 
> expected:<0.0> but was:<1.0658141036401503E-14>
> [ERROR]   EnumeratedIntegerDistributionTest.testMath1533:196
> [ERROR]   EnumeratedIntegerDistributionTest.testSample:174 expected:<7.84> 
> but was:<7.857073891264003>
> [ERROR]   MiniBatchKMeansClustererTest.testCompareToKMeans:86 Different score 
> ratio 46.645378%!, diff points ratio: 34.716981%
> [ERROR]   CalinskiHarabaszTest.test_compare_to_skLearn:102 
> expected:<597.7763150683217> but was:<559.2829020672648>
> [ERROR]   MultiStartMultivariateOptimizerTest.testCircleFitting:76 
> expected:<69.9597> but was:<69.96228624385736>
> [ERROR]   MultiStartMultivariateOptimizerTest.testRosenbrock:114 numEval=873
> [ERROR]   GaussianRandomGeneratorTest.testMeanAndStandardDeviation:37 
> expected:<1.0> but was:<0.9715310171501561>
> [ERROR]   NaturalRankingTest.testNaNsFixedTiesRandom:227 Array comparison 
> failure
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)

Reply via email to