[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17353457#comment-17353457
]
Gilles Sadowski edited comment on NUMBERS-156 at 5/28/21, 4:49 PM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
{quote}The true purpose of the commons-numbers-arrays module has always been
kind of fuzzy for me.
{quote}
Modularization pushed beyond reason. ;)
{quote}Which classes specifically are you picturing moving to core?
{quote}
Pretty much everything could indeed go to {{commons-numbers-core}}. However
there will be an issue with the unit tests for {{LinearCombination}}: They
depend on {{commons-numbers-fraction}}.
was (Author: erans):
{quote}The true purpose of the commons-numbers-arrays module has always been
kind of fuzzy for me.
{quote}
Modularization pushed beyond reason. ;)
{quote}Which classes specifically are you picturing moving to core?
{quote}
Pretty much everything could indeed go to {{commons-numbers-core}}. However
there will be an issue with the unit tests for {{LinearCombination}}: They
depend on {{commons-numbers-fraction}}.
2.12.0.0
> SafeNorm 3D overload
> --------------------
>
> Key: NUMBERS-156
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-156
> Project: Commons Numbers
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Matt Juntunen
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: performance-all.png, performance-len-1-5.png,
> performance2-1-5.png, performance2-all.png, performance3-1-5.png,
> performance3-all.png, performance4-1-5.png, performance4-all.png,
> performance5-1-5.png, performance5-all.png
>
> Time Spent: 10m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We should create an overload of {{SafeNorm.value}} that accepts 3 arguments
> to potentially improve performance for 3D vectors.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
