[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-156?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17360203#comment-17360203
]
Matt Juntunen commented on NUMBERS-156:
---------------------------------------
This looks ok to me. Have we verified that there aren't any performance
implications here?
What do you think [~aherbert]?
> SafeNorm 3D overload
> --------------------
>
> Key: NUMBERS-156
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUMBERS-156
> Project: Commons Numbers
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Matt Juntunen
> Priority: Major
> Attachments: performance-all.png, performance-len-1-5.png,
> performance2-1-5.png, performance2-all.png, performance3-1-5.png,
> performance3-all.png, performance4-1-5.png, performance4-all.png,
> performance5-1-5.png, performance5-all.png
>
> Time Spent: 5.5h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> We should create an overload of {{SafeNorm.value}} that accepts 3 arguments
> to potentially improve performance for 3D vectors.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)
