After thoughtful deliberation, I also favor lang3 package change. My
reasoning is so that migration is not an all-or-nothing for users. They
can use both lang < 3 and lang 3 simultaneously and transition overtime.
Paul
On 12/9/2009 2:52 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Sorry - forgot the marker.
On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:51 AM, Henri Yandell<[email protected]> wrote:
Perhaps now is the right time to do the package change?
Does anyone have a better idea than:
org.apache.commons.lang -> org.apache.commons.lang3?
That kind of sets us up for lang 4.0 needing a package change as well,
but I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing.
Hen
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:00 AM, Niall Pemberton (JIRA)<[email protected]> wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12787657#action_12787657
]
Niall Pemberton commented on LANG-561:
--------------------------------------
Presumably there is going to be a package name change before Lang 3.0 is
released? If so everything breaks.
