[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12789455#action_12789455
 ] 

Jesse Morris commented on DAEMON-131:
-------------------------------------

KREG_WOW6432 doesn't come from any standard header.  It's conditionally defined 
at the top of prunsrv.c.  The reason we need to use that flag for deletion is 
that KREG_WOW6432 was already specified for the creation and access of the key, 
presumably so that it can share settings between 32-bit and 64-bit versions of 
procrun.   Whether *that* makes sense to actually do is another question, which 
depends largely on how people are using the tool.  I don't really have any 
insight into that.   

If you were already seeing compilation problems on from it's macro expansion 
(KEY_WOW64_32KEY) then this is a fine time to fix them.  If it was compiling ok 
a few days ago, my patch shouldn't break it.

> Win64 build:   //DS// fails to delete registry keys
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DAEMON-131
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DAEMON-131
>             Project: Commons Daemon
>          Issue Type: Bug
>         Environment: Win64; I've only seen it on AMD64, but presumably it 
> would also happen on ia64.
>            Reporter: Jesse Morris
>            Assignee: Mladen Turk
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: procrun-win64-registry-cleanup.patch
>
>
> When creating and accessing the configuration registry keys, the tool uses 
> CreateRegKeyEx with the KEY_WOW64_32KEY flag, telling windows "Use the 32-bit 
> hive instead of the 64-bit one".  Maybe this was done so that 64-bit daemons 
> could use the configuration from 32-bit ones?  
> Anyway when it's time to go and delete the configuration from the registry it 
> uses the ancient SHDeleteKey call, which tries to delete the key from the 
> 64-bit hive, which fails, so the key is left behind.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to