aherbert commented on pull request #258: URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/pull/258#issuecomment-996038887
I was thinking more of the case where a non-sparse filter of several thousand bit maps is tested to contain a filter of 20 indices. The primary use case for this is better served using contains(Hasher). If comparing filters is mostly done with two of the same sparseness type, and isSparse is a property then it doesn't matter. isSparse seems appropriate. The concept of sparse arrays describes a similar structure where the storage is proportional to the number of entries and not the maximum supported index. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: [email protected]
