[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-142?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17480549#comment-17480549
]
Bruno P. Kinoshita commented on GEOMETRY-142:
---------------------------------------------
No objections [~mattjuntunen] . +1 on the initial implementation. I just synced
the branch I had, and to get mvn command passing, had to add this
diff --git a/pom.xml b/pom.xml
index 5e14c5dc..05487f7e 100644
--- a/pom.xml
+++ b/pom.xml
@@ -335,6 +335,7 @@
<exclude>src/site/resources/release-notes/RELEASE-NOTES-*.txt</exclude>
<exclude>src/site/resources/txt/userguide/stress/**</exclude>
<exclude>dist-archive/**</exclude>
+
<exclude>commons-geometry-examples/examples-jmh/src/main/resources/jmh-data/teapot-points.txt</exclude>
</excludes>
</configuration>
</plugin>
Looking forward to the pull request!
> Point Set/Map
> -------------
>
> Key: GEOMETRY-142
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GEOMETRY-142
> Project: Apache Commons Geometry
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Matt Juntunen
> Priority: Major
>
> It would be very useful to have set and map implementations that accepts
> points and vectors as keys and use "fuzzy" look up logic, where values are
> compared using a precision context. This would have uses in a number of
> situations, including the implementation of GEOMETRY-110.
> Options for the implementation of such classes include
> * BSP trees (as already implemented)
> * k-d trees
> * quadtrees/octrees
> * r-trees
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.1#820001)
