[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-94?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anon Devs updated COMPRESS-94:
------------------------------
Attachment: COMPRESS-94.patch
Patch for COMPRESS-94 to fix the equals() implementation in ZipArchiveEntry.
> Creating zip files with many entries will ocassionally produce corrupted
> output
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COMPRESS-94
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COMPRESS-94
> Project: Commons Compress
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.0
> Environment: Windows 2003 Server 64 bit, Java 6.0
> Reporter: Anon Devs
> Attachments: COMPRESS-94.patch
>
>
> Our application produces large numbers of zip files, often with 1000's of
> similarly named files contained within the zip.
> When we switched from the standard JDK zip classes to those in commons
> compress, we would ocassionally produce a zip file that had corrupted index
> entries and would fail to unzip successfully using 7-zip, winzip, etc.
> Debugging the zip creation showed that the the wrong offsets were being
> returned from the hashmap in ZipOutputStream for the entries that were being
> corrupted. Further analysis revealed that this occurred when the filenames
> being added had a hash collision with another entry in the same output zip
> (which appears to happen quite frequently for us).
> The issue appears to stem from the fact that ZipArchiveEntry can store the
> entry name either in its superclass if passed in on the ctor or in its own
> member attribute if set later via setName(). Not sure whether this
> functionality is really required? Regardless, the root cause of the bug is
> that the equals() and hashCode() methods in ZipArchiveEntry do not always use
> the same filename value in their comparisons. In fact if the filename of the
> entry is set in the ctor it will always treat two ZipArchiveEntries as equal.
> This will break the offset hashmap whenever there is a hash collision as it
> will overwrite the previous entry, believeing it to be equal.
> Patch to follow.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
