[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12831145#action_12831145
]
Matt Benson commented on LANG-588:
----------------------------------
Actually I'm now having second thoughts about how much call there is for
iterating Pairs ;) , and if there is there's a fairly quick way to do it
already:
{code}
Pair<Integer, Double> pair = pairOf(10, 100d);
List<? extends Number> l = Arrays.asList(pair.left, pair.right);
{code}
So in this case, we could drop the iteration issue, calculate hashCode always,
and be done?
> Create a basic Pair<L, R> class
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-588
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-588
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: lang.*
> Reporter: Matt Benson
> Fix For: 3.0
>
> Attachments: MatchedPair.java, MatchedPairTest.java, Pair.java,
> PairTest.java
>
>
> [lang] is the perfect place to provide a basic typed Pair class. I have
> written such a class for my employer (who hasn't?) but can/will rewrite blind
> to avoid IP issues. I think it's also nice to go ahead and extend this to
> MatchedPair<T> extends Pair<T, T> as well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
