[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17570701#comment-17570701
]
Alexander Kriegisch commented on BCEL-362:
------------------------------------------
Some kind of reaction would be much appreciated after one month. Even if you
think that this is invalid, an explanation would be helpful. My working
hypothesis is that something is wrong in BCEL, but it is entirely possible that
I as a layman am simply misunderstanding something here.
> Handling for Constants.CONSTANT_Dynamic is missing in class ConstantPool
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BCEL-362
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BCEL-362
> Project: Commons BCEL
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Alexander Kriegisch
> Priority: Major
>
> _Disclaimer: I am not a byte code buff, so if I am misunderstanding anything
> here, please forgive me for raising a stupid issue, try to be patient and
> explain it to me._
> When looking at the class
> {{[ConstantPool|https://github.com/apache/commons-bcel/blob/5165671d2bc4bed17918051f1689ee5fd4c3425a/src/main/java/org/apache/bcel/classfile/ConstantPool.java]}},
> it seems as if condy is not being handled in methods
> * {{constantToString(Constant)}},
> * {{addConstant(Constant, ConstantPool)}},
> * {{addConstantDynamic(int, int)}} (method does not exist, not sure if it
> would be necessary).
> I would have expected something like {{case Constants.CONSTANT_Dynamic}} with
> proper handling for this case in the first two methods.
> When using BCEL in order to parse class files using condy, like JaCoCo
> creates them, this causes errors. FYI, we are using BCEL code in AspectJ, and
> whenever people combine it with JaCoCo, corresponding problems occur.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)
