[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1648?focusedWorklogId=795710&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-795710
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on MATH-1648:
----------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 27/Jul/22 15:09
            Start Date: 27/Jul/22 15:09
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: aherbert commented on PR #210:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-math/pull/210#issuecomment-1196886237

   Some of the unit tests use random seeds. As such any objects used by these 
tests may have coverage variations due to the code execution paths differing 
between runs. What is important here is the diff coverage is 100%, i.e. what 
you added is all covered by tests.
   
   The changes look good. Please see the Jira ticket for a suggestion to 
improve efficiency of the computation.
   




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 795710)
    Time Spent: 0.5h  (was: 20m)

> Derivative computations for BicubicInterpolator's
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-1648
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1648
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 4.X
>            Reporter: Alessandro Moscatelli
>            Assignee: Alessandro Moscatelli
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 0.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Hi there !
> I would like to improve the BicubicInterpolator (or the 
> PiecewiseBicubicInterpolator) with the possibility to evaluate x, y, xy 
> derivatives.
> In the deprecated BicubicSplineInterpolator it was already possibile.
> Before I start writing any lines of code I would like to know the rationale 
> about removing this functionality.
> Also, do you have any suggestion or guideline ?
> I forked on github, I would like to contibute with a PR.
> Thank you in advance



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to