Claudenw commented on code in PR #331:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/pull/331#discussion_r955676036
##########
src/test/java/org/apache/commons/collections4/bloomfilter/AbstractBloomFilterTest.java:
##########
@@ -62,49 +62,34 @@ protected final Shape getTestShape() {
*/
protected abstract T createEmptyFilter(Shape shape);
- /**
- * Create the BloomFilter implementation we are testing.
- *
- * @param shape the shape of the filter.
- * @param hasher the hasher to use to create the filter.
- * @return a BloomFilter implementation.
- */
- protected abstract T createFilter(Shape shape, Hasher hasher);
Review Comment:
If this is a common pattern then why are we removing it from the interface?
I think the addition of the 2 merge functions is a good one, but I am still not
convinced that the move from a simple constructor to 2 methods is a good one.
I think the convenience constructors should remain.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
