[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-588?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12836235#action_12836235
]
Matt Benson commented on LANG-588:
----------------------------------
Okay, I know I said I was happy to bikeshed, but as it turns out I don't really
feel that happy. ;) We now have seemingly too many divergent suggestions to
achieve consensus. By using interfaces we would also seem to give up a
convenient place to keep our static factory methods. I will additionally note
that I will make no argument against emulating the emerging of() standard if
indeed it is such (I'll take your word on this, Stephen).
> Create a basic Pair<L, R> class
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-588
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-588
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: lang.*
> Reporter: Matt Benson
> Fix For: 3.0
>
> Attachments: Pair.java, PairTest.java
>
>
> [lang] is the perfect place to provide a basic typed Pair class. I have
> written such a class for my employer (who hasn't?) but can/will rewrite blind
> to avoid IP issues. I think it's also nice to go ahead and extend this to
> MatchedPair<T> extends Pair<T, T> as well.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
