[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Niall Pemberton updated LANG-459:
---------------------------------

    Fix Version/s:     (was: Nightly Builds)
                       (was: 3.0)
                   2.5

> Issue in HashCodeBuilder which only shows up under high load multi-threaded 
> usage.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LANG-459
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-459
>             Project: Commons Lang
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: lang.builder.*
>    Affects Versions: 2.4
>         Environment: All
>            Reporter: Andrew Wilson
>             Fix For: 2.5
>
>         Attachments: HashCodeBuilder.java, MyTest.java
>
>   Original Estimate: 0.08h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0.08h
>
> We found we were having problems with HashCodeBuilder under multi-threaded 
> high load.
> I narrowed this down to the following attached test case.
> When I dug into the code, I found the problem was solved by commenting out 
> the isRegistered method (though this would break the infinite loop problem).
> ( I did a lot of other digging that I wont bore you with).
> So instead I replaced the HashSet with an ArrayList and just added the 
> object, rather than the toIdentityHashCodeInteger(object)
> This results in about 5 lines of change.  
> My suspicion is that System.identityHashCode does not return unique values 
> (it is after all a hashcode method).  The code assumes it will return a 
> unique value and this causes the problem at high loads.
> The downside is a List vs. a Set, but I believe this is necessary.
> I'd like to submit this fix and have it verified (and perhaps improved).  I 
> am convinced it is a necessary fix which we have seen show up under high 
> loads.
> Kindest regards, 
> Andrew.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to