[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12848220#action_12848220
]
Niall Pemberton commented on BEANUTILS-362:
-------------------------------------------
I doubt many (if any) are going to be trying to de-serialize from a previous
version - I expect they are usually short lived. Also the implication from this
ticket is that different JVM implementations could calculate different values -
if thats true then theres little value in setting them to whatever JVM
implementation I'm using.
Anyone else got an opinion on whether this is OK to stay or we should just
revert the change and close this ticket as WONTFIX?
> Add serialVersionUID to Serializable classes
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BEANUTILS-362
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-362
> Project: Commons BeanUtils
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Sebb
> Assignee: Niall Pemberton
> Fix For: 1.8.3
>
> Attachments: beanutils-362.diff
>
>
> The following classes are Serializable, but don't have serialVersionUID
> defined:
> BasicDynaBean
> BasicDynaClass
> DynaProperty
> LazyDynaBean
> LazyDynaList
> Performance (and JVM interoperability) would be improved by adding the UIDs.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
