FTP: EPRT fails + EPRT/EPSV issues
----------------------------------

                 Key: NET-313
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NET-313
             Project: Commons Net
          Issue Type: Bug
    Affects Versions: 2.1
         Environment: FTP server = vsftpd/Centos 5.4
FTPClient = commons-net (FTPClient) ;)
Network = IPv4

            Reporter: Felix Bolte
         Attachments: ftp_nat.patch

as implemented in NET-288, the client can work now via IPv6 ... EPSV is not 
only useful on IPv6 but also when NAT is enabled (see [RFC 
2428|http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2428])

what my patch does:

 * (re)enable EPSV command on IPv4 too (i dont know why [[email protected]] 
removed it from the supplied patch in NET-288 (see comments in patch)
 * sending EPRT only if we are over IPv6, cause there is no advantage over PORT 
on IPv4, it could even have disadvantages (see comments in patch)
 * EPRT was sending the result of getActivePort() to the server, but when there 
was no activePortRange set, it did send 0 as default which leads to an error on 
server site:
{quote}
Tue Mar 23 17:17:20 2010 [pid 10581] [ftpuser] FTP command: Client 
"192.168.11.130", "EPRT |1|192.168.11.130|0|"
Tue Mar 23 17:17:20 2010 [pid 10581] [ftpuser] FTP response: Client 
"192.168.11.130", "500 Illegal EPRT command."
{quote}
 * and even calling getActivePort() has no sense here, cause that port is used 
to be random, but we should send same port  where the ServerSocket is listening 
on -> server.getLocalPort()
 * getActivePort() checks if __activeMaxPort > __activeMinPort, but when i want 
to set a range of only one single port (min==max) it would return 0 ... now it 
will check if equal and return __activeMaxPort

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to