[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-173?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17789668#comment-17789668
 ] 

Gary D. Gregory commented on LOGGING-173:
-----------------------------------------

The plan (or at least mine) is not breaking binary compatibility in the 
upcoming 1.3.0 release ;) So NOTHING will be removed. Any breaking of BC will 
have to be for a future 2.0 with the usual mechanics for a new major release.

There are a few more PRs from [~pkarwasz] to handle for 1.3.0 so I should be 
able to cut a release candidate very soon.

> Shall we remove AvalonLogger and LogKitLogger?
> ----------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOGGING-173
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOGGING-173
>             Project: Commons Logging
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Tomo Suzuki
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Do you think it's good idea to move 
> org.apache.commons.logging.impl.AvalonLogger and 
> org.apache.commons.logging.impl.LogKitLogger from commons-logging? (logkit is 
> part of the Avalon project)
> I see Apache Avalon project closed in 2004. 
> https://avalon.apache.org/closed.html
> (I'm not suffering from these classes. I found these classes while 
> [investigating class references using our 
> tool|https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/cloud-opensource-java/issues/1871]
>  and saw the Avalon project has been closed a while ago. I thought it's a 
> good idea to share the finding here)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to