[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-808?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17799033#comment-17799033
 ] 

Phil D commented on IO-808:
---------------------------

I completely agree with [~elharo] .  This is my thought exactly.  I personally 
was pushing backwards compatibility to force IOExceptions where there used to 
be IOExceptions in the older version and believe that removing unchecked 
IllegalArgumentExceptions and replacing them with checked IOExceptions is the 
way to go.

Trying to keep IllegalArgumentExceptions compatible with the existing javadoc 
while doing IOExceptions in other areas looked difficult when I dug through the 
source code and changing everything over to checked IOExceptions or their 
derivatives looks simpler, more standards conforming and is less prone to API 
users receiving unexpected results.

> FileUtils.moveFile, copyFile and others can throw undocumened 
> IllegalArgumentException
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IO-808
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IO-808
>             Project: Commons IO
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Utilities
>    Affects Versions: 2.12.0
>         Environment: Windows 10
>            Reporter: Phil D
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: MakyAckyBreaky.java, TestMoveFileIAE.java
>
>
> Several of the functions in FileUtils are throwing undocumented 
> IllegalArgumentException such as moveFile, copyFile and other locations. 
> If the desire is to maintain backwards compatibility with the 1.4 branch for 
> these functions, then the 2.12 (and 2.13) versions are throwing 
> IllegalArgumentException in cases  where 1.4 is not.  In fact, it seems like 
> 1.4 was coded to specifically avoid IllegalArgumentException and throws 
> IOExceptions instead.
> There are several different cases where this is possible.  In the most basic, 
> I've attached TestMoveFileIAE, where this can be reproduced by simple running:
> {code:bash}
> mkdir one
> java -cp <your_classpath> TestMoveFileIAE one two
> Exception in thread "main" java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Parameter 
> 'srcFile' is not a file: one
>         at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.requireFile(FileUtils.java:2824)
>         at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.moveFile(FileUtils.java:2395)
>         at org.apache.commons.io.FileUtils.moveFile(FileUtils.java:2374)
>         at TestMoveFileIAE.main(TestMoveFileIAE.java:13)
> {code}
> In a less likely scenario (which is how I found this issue because this 
> happened on a production system); If the srcFile is removed at a certain 
> point during moveFile() execution then IllegalArgumentException is throws:
> https://github.com/apache/commons-io/blob/master/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/io/FileUtils.java#L2392
> {code:java}
> 2392    public static void moveFile(final File srcFile, final File destFile, 
> final CopyOption... copyOptions) throws IOException {
> 2393    validateMoveParameters(srcFile, destFile); // checks srcFile.exists()
>               /// ==== srcFile deleted here!!!
> 2394    requireFile(srcFile, "srcFile");           // checks srcFile.isFile() 
> and throws IAE
> 2395    requireAbsent(destFile, "destFile");
>               /// ==== srcFile could also be deleted here 
> 2396    ... // renameTo or copyFile() which also calls requireCopyFile() and 
> requireFile()
> {code}
> This pattern of calling validateMoveParameters() and requireFile() will throw 
> IllegalArgumentException every when the srcFile is removed between between 
> validateMoveParameters() and requireFile() or requireFileCopy() and 
> requireFile()
> Preferably, it would be best if the 2.x versions of FileUtils were backwards 
> compatible with 1.x and IllegalArgumentException would not be thrown, but 
> IOException (or one of its derivatives) would be.   IAE is an unchecked 
> exception and can cause unexpected issues.
> I would also suggest that unit tests be created to ensure that these 
> functions behave as expected in error conditions.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to