[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17817059#comment-17817059
 ] 

Dénes Bodó commented on DBCP-595:
---------------------------------

Thank you Phil for your inputs.

I'll go back testing your suggestions and will provide answers for your 
questions in one-two days.

> Connection pool can be exhausted when connections are killed on the DB side
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DBCP-595
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DBCP-595
>             Project: Commons DBCP
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.11.0
>            Reporter: Dénes Bodó
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: deadlock, robustness
>
> Apache Oozie 5.2.1 uses OpenJPA 2.4.2 and commons-dbcp 1.4 and commons-pool 
> 1.5.4. These are ancient versions, I know.
> h1. Description
> The issue is that when due to some network issues or "maintenance work" on 
> the DB side (especially PostgreSQL) which causes the DB connection to be 
> closed, it results exhausted Pool on the client side. Many threads are 
> waiting at this point:
> {noformat}
> "pool-2-thread-4" #20 prio=5 os_prio=31 tid=0x00007faf7903b800 nid=0x8603 
> waiting on condition [0x000000030f3e7000]
>    java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking)
>       at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>       - parking to wait for  <0x000000066aca8e70> (a 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject)
>       at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:175)
>       at 
> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2039)
>       at 
> org.apache.commons.pool2.impl.LinkedBlockingDeque.takeFirst(LinkedBlockingDeque.java:1324)
>  {noformat}
> According to my observation this is because the JDBC driver does not get 
> closed on the client side, nor the abstract DBCP connection 
> _org.apache.commons.dbcp2.PoolableConnection_ .
> h1. Repro
> (Un)Fortunately I can reproduce the issue using the latest and greatest 
> commons-dbcp 2.11.0 and commons-pool 2.12.0 along with OpenJPA 3.2.2.
> I've just created a Java application to reproduce the issue: 
> [https://github.com/dionusos/pool_exhausted_repro] . See README.md for 
> detailed repro steps.
> h1. Kind of solution?
> To be honest I am not really familiar with DBCP but with this change I 
> managed to make my application more robust:
> {code:java}
> diff --git a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/PoolableConnection.java 
> b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/PoolableConnection.java
> index 440cb756..678550bf 100644
> --- a/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/PoolableConnection.java
> +++ b/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/PoolableConnection.java
> @@ -214,6 +214,10 @@ public class PoolableConnection extends 
> DelegatingConnection<Connection> impleme
>      @Override
>      protected void handleException(final SQLException e) throws SQLException 
> {
>          fatalSqlExceptionThrown |= isFatalException(e);
> +        if (fatalSqlExceptionThrown && getDelegate() != null) {
> +            getDelegate().close();
> +            this.close();
> +        }
>          super.handleException(e);
>      }{code}
> What do you think about this approach?
> Is it a completely dead-end or we can start working on it in this direction?
> Do you agree that the reported and reproduced issue is a real one and nut 
> just some kind of misconfiguration?
>  
> I am lost at this point and I need to move forward so I am asking for 
> guidance here.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to