[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1752?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17881337#comment-17881337
]
Gary D. Gregory commented on LANG-1752:
---------------------------------------
Hello [~SaifAsif]
I'm not sure this is the best approach IMO because there is more than one
dimension to the APIs than case-sensitivity. My thinking here is to create a
"Strings" class with defaults for:
- case-sensitivity
- Locale
- Charset
A default instance would be used like:
{code:java}
Strings.DEFAULT.startWith(...)
{code}
and
{code:java}
public static final Strings.MY_UTILS =
Strings.builder().setCaseSenstivity(false).build();
MY_UTILS.startWith(...)
{code}
FYI, this has come up before:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/fb5myt33lprq464wyp98ox5mt2f9ghpm
> Seperating ignoresCase APIs from StringUtils
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-1752
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-1752
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 4.0
> Reporter: Saif Asif
> Priority: Major
>
> Overtime, more and more APIs are being added to the StringUtils class that
> are a variation of existing APIs based on casing e.g `endsWithIgnoreCase` is
> just `endsWith` with an additional boolean ignoreCase set to true.
> {code:java}
> public static boolean endsWithIgnoreCase(final CharSequence str, final
> CharSequence suffix) {
> return endsWith(str, suffix, true);
> }
> private static boolean endsWith(final CharSequence str, final CharSequence
> suffix, final boolean ignoreCase) {}{code}
>
> This leads to StringUtils class increasing in size.
> I would like to propose that we refactor StringUtils class and move all
> ignoreCase APIs to their own class e.g something like
> {code:java}
> StringUtilsIgnoreCase{code}
> or so.
> Since the refactoring will be huge, we can target for the next major version
> (4.0?) and introduce `@deprecated` on the methods to give users enough time
> to track and update their existing code bases.
> What does the community think ?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)