[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Roman Werpachowski updated MATH-391:
------------------------------------
Description:
ArrayRealVector(double[] d) allows to construct a zero-length vector, but
ArrayRealVector(double[] d, boolean copyArray) doesn't. Both should allow this
as zero-length vectors are mathematically well-defined objects and they are
useful boundary cases in many algorithms.
This breaks some arithmetic operators (addition) on zero-length real vectors
which worked in 2.0 but don't work in 2.1
was:
ArrayRealVector(double[] d) allows to construct a zero-length vector, but
ArrayRealVector(double[] d, boolean copyArray) doesn't. Both should allow this
as zero-length vectors are mathematically well-defined objects and they are
useful boundary cases in many algorithms.
Zero-length vectors worked in version 2.0, they should be working in 2.1 as
well.
> Inconsistent behaviour of constructors in ArrayRealVector class
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-391
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-391
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.1
> Reporter: Roman Werpachowski
>
> ArrayRealVector(double[] d) allows to construct a zero-length vector, but
> ArrayRealVector(double[] d, boolean copyArray) doesn't. Both should allow
> this as zero-length vectors are mathematically well-defined objects and they
> are useful boundary cases in many algorithms.
> This breaks some arithmetic operators (addition) on zero-length real vectors
> which worked in 2.0 but don't work in 2.1
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
