[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12933083#action_12933083
 ] 

Nikolaus Hansen commented on MATH-442:
--------------------------------------

I think the CMA-ES fits fine into to direct category (but I am familiar with 
the meaning of the word direct search, I don't assume everyone is).

Nelder-Mead and CMA-ES are similar in that they do not need derivatives and 
they do not even need function values: they are comparison based and only use a 
ranking between a number of candidate solutions. Moreover, Nelder-Mead and 
CMA-ES share all their invariance properties (not many other optimization 
algorithms do). Being rank-based implies invariance under monotonous 
transformations of the objective function value, but there are others (e.g. 
invariance under coordinate system changes). I believe these are important 
properties, also from the application viewpoint. The main conceptional 
different to Nelder-Mead: CMA-ES is stochastic (randomized, if you like).  The 
main practical difference: CMA-ES works also in large dimension and there is a 
control parameter for tuning the locality of search. 

You could have an elaborate discussion whether CMA-ES estimates a gradient. My 
take on it: methods that move opposite to the gradient will regularly fail 
anyway. 

I also find it strange that algorithms in the general category are in fact less 
general. 

Where can I subscribe to the list? 

> CMA evolution strategy is missing in optimization
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-442
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-442
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>    Affects Versions: 3.0
>            Reporter: Dr. Dietmar Wolz
>   Original Estimate: 48h
>  Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> Recently I implemented the optimization algorithm CMA-ES based on 
> org.apache.commons.math.linear and used it for the GTOC5 global trajectory 
> optimization contest http://gtoc5.math.msu.su/. It implements the 
> MultivariateRealOptimizer interface and would nicely fit into the 
> org.apache.commons.math.optimization package. The original author of CMA-ES 
> (Nikolaus Hansen) volunteered to support me (proof-reading + testing) in the 
> creation of a CMA-ES contribution for commons.math. 
> The CMA evolution strategy http://www.lri.fr/~hansen/cmaesintro.html is a 
> very powerful algorithm for difficult non-linear non-convex optimization 
> problems in continuous domain. See http://www.lri.fr/~hansen/cec2005.html for 
> a comparison chart. If there is interest I will create a patch including the 
> proposed Implementation for evaluation. It seems we would need an additional 
> sub-package - org.apache.commons.math.optimization.evolutionary.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to