alhudz opened a new pull request, #1833:
URL: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/1833

   Repro: `NumberUtils.createNumber(" 1.5")`, `createNumber("\t1e5")`, 
`createNumber(" 1.5d")`, or `isCreatable(" 1.5")`.
   Expected: `NumberFormatException` from `createNumber` and `false` from 
`isCreatable`. The `createNumber` Javadoc says it does not trim the input and 
that leading or trailing spaces produce a `NumberFormatException`, and 
`createNumber(" 1111")` does throw.
   Actual: `1.5` (`Float`), `100000.0` (`Float`), `1.5` (`Double`) and `true`.
   Cause: the integral paths reject whitespace because `Integer.decode`, 
`Long.decode` and `BigInteger` do, but any input with a decimal point, an 
exponent or an `f`/`F`/`d`/`D` suffix is handed to `Float.valueOf` and 
`Double.valueOf`, which strip leading characters up to U+0020 as if by 
`String.trim()`. The leading character is only inspected for a sign, so the 
whitespace rides along into the delegate. Trailing whitespace is already caught 
because it is taken as an unknown type suffix.
   Fix: reject a leading character at or below U+0020 in `createNumber` before 
any delegate is reached, so the decimal paths behave like the integral paths 
and the Javadoc. `isCreatable` and the deprecated `isNumber` delegate to 
`createNumber`, so they are covered by the same check. Valid input, and 
trailing whitespace, are unchanged.
   
   Regression assertions added next to the existing `" 1111"` cases in 
`NumberUtilsTest.testIsCreatable` and `testIsNumber`; both tests fail before 
the change (`Expecting false for isCreatable/createNumber using " 1.5" but got 
true and true`) and pass after. There is no Commons Text counterpart of 
`NumberUtils` to check.
   
   - [x] Read the [contribution guidelines](CONTRIBUTING.md) for this project.
   - [x] Read the [ASF Generative Tooling 
Guidance](https://www.apache.org/legal/generative-tooling.html) if you use 
Artificial Intelligence (AI).
   - [x] I used AI to create any part of, or all of, this pull request. Which 
AI tool was used to create this pull request, and to what extent did it 
contribute? Claude Code (Anthropic) found the issue, wrote the patch and the 
test assertions, and ran the build; I reviewed the change before submitting.
   - [x] Run a successful build using the default 
[Maven](https://maven.apache.org/) goal with `mvn`; that's `mvn` on the command 
line by itself.
   - [x] Write unit tests that match behavioral changes, where the tests fail 
if the changes to the runtime are not applied. This may not always be possible, 
but it is a best practice.
   - [x] Write a pull request description that is detailed enough to understand 
what the pull request does, how, and why.
   - [x] Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line 
and body. Note that a maintainer may squash commits during the merge process.
   


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to