[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1695?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=18137993#comment-18137993
]
James Howe edited comment on MATH-1695 at 11/4/26, 1:51 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
{quote}Not sure what you mean.{quote}
As in, before work can be done to build a Vector API implementation, does the
legacy package need to go through "modularization" first?
was (Author: jameshowe):
> Not sure what you mean.
As in, before work can be done to build a Vector API implementation, does the
legacy package need to go through "modularization" first?
> Vector API implementation for linear package
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-1695
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1695
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: legacy
> Reporter: James Howe
> Priority: Major
>
> Theoretically big performance gain to be had from new JVM features under the
> same interfaces.
> Is this blocked by spinning out a new Commons-Linear or similar?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v10.3.26#10030026)
