[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-374?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13015127#comment-13015127
]
Sebb commented on COLLECTIONS-374:
----------------------------------
I should have added - test1() does seem to be valid.
Not sure whether test0() is useful, given that the class is deprecated, but it
does seem to expose a failure, as the hashCode is not stable.
> Bug in class#BeanMap and TransformedBuffer with reproducible JUnit test
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: COLLECTIONS-374
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COLLECTIONS-374
> Project: Commons Collections
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.2
> Environment: jdk 1.6.0
> Reporter: Sai Zhang
> Attachments: ApacheCommons_Documented_Test.java
>
>
> Hi all:
> (as in the previous post)
> I am writing an automated bug finding tool, and using
> Apache Commons Collections as an experimental subject
> for evaluation.
> The tool creates executable JUnit tests as well as
> explanatory code comments. I attached one bug-revealing
> test as follows. Could you please kindly check it, to
> see if it is a real bug or not?
> Also, it would be tremendous helpful if you could give
> some feedback and suggestion on the generated code comments?
> From the perspective of developers who are relatively familiar
> with the code,
> is the automatically-inferred comment useful in understanding
> the generated test? is the comment helpful in bug fixing?
> Your suggestion will help us improve the tool.
> Please see attachment for the failed test.
> The comment appears in the form of:
> //Tests pass if .... (it gives some small change to the test which can make
> the failed test pass)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
