[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-177?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Thomas resolved POOL-177.
------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
Having restarted the pool2 re-factoring using dbcp2 as a reality check for what
we do with pool2, GenericObjectPoolFactory and GenericKeyedObjectPoolFactory
have nothing in common that could usefully be pulled up into a base class.
> GenericKeyedObjectPoolFactory and GenericObjectPoolFactory to share a common
> superclass
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: POOL-177
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/POOL-177
> Project: Commons Pool
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: Nightly Builds
> Reporter: Gary D. Gregory
> Fix For: 2.0
>
> Attachments: POOL-177.diff, POOL-177.diff
>
>
> I see now in trunk that GenericKeyedObjectPoolConfig extends
> GenericObjectPoolConfig, which I like.
> It seems that the next step would be for GenericKeyedObjectPoolFactory and
> GenericObjectPoolFactory to share a common superclass.
> To see what I mean, look at the patch in this ticket.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
