[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-727?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13080001#comment-13080001
]
Matt Benson commented on LANG-727:
----------------------------------
We _could_ do it that way, though it would at least make the test less concise.
So is it your opinion that the java.vm.vendor is the important thing here,
rather than the java.vendor? I would have thought that *java* would signify
the class library in use while *vm* would signify only that (the VM). WDYT?
What is the value of java.vendor?
> ToStringBuilderTest.testReflectionHierarchyArrayList fails with IBM JDK 6
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-727
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-727
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: lang.builder.*
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Joerg Schaible
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 3.0.2
>
>
> The unit test fails when running with IBM JDK 6:
> {noformat}
> Failed tests:
> testReflectionHierarchyArrayList(org.apache.commons.lang3.builder.ToStringBuilderTest): null
> expected:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[elementData={<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,null>,null>,null>},size=0],modCount=0]>
> but
> was:<....ArrayList@115b115b[[firstIndex=0,lastIndex=0,array={<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,<null>,null>,null>,null>}],modCount=0]>
> {noformat}
> Actually the test is wrong, because it makes wrong assumptions about the
> implementation of ArrayList in the runtime.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
