[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097642#comment-13097642
]
Niall Pemberton commented on CHAIN-55:
--------------------------------------
I agree with splitting the modules, mainly because I think the "web" elements
are off-putting for users who want a simple CoR pattern. But I would keep the
"web" components (i.e. Servlet, Portlet, Faces) together as a single module.
This would allow WebContext & the Get/SetLocaleCommands to be part of the "web"
module, rather than having to put it in the "core APIs" (since Servlet,
Portlet & Faces implement them). Marking portlet & faces dependencies as
"optional" in the pom.xml would prevent unnecessary dependencies being included.
> split the huge project in submodules
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: CHAIN-55
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CHAIN-55
> Project: Commons Chain
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Simone Tripodi
> Assignee: Simone Tripodi
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> As discussed in the [dev ML|http://markmail.org/message/pnyin5xzmxt2up5q],
> there is a general agreement between people interested on chain, on splitting
> the huge component in small submodules, in order to have a lightweight,
> dependencies-less (unless the logging library, if required) and
> self-contained core module, and users interested on core APIs only don't need
> to bring unused code in their applications. SUggested modules are:
> * core APIs;
> * XML configuration APIs (depends from Digester);
> * servlet (depends from Servlet APIs);
> * portlet (depends from Portlet APIs);
> * faces (depends from Faces APIs).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
