[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-20?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13097795#comment-13097795
 ] 

Maurizio Cucchiara edited comment on OGNL-20 at 9/6/11 8:21 AM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Olivier, 
be aware that there is already:
# a [patch|WW-3580] which sensibly reduces the synchronized code using 
something like the double check idiom.
# an old [opensymphony patch|http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-101] 
which, if I recall correctly, uses concurrent version of the map implementation.

It would be very interesting to compare this 3 different approaches. Before 
that, I think we would need a performance test bench.

      was (Author: maurizio.cucchiara):
    Hi Olivier, 
be aware that there is already:
# a [patch|WW-3580] which sensibly reduces the synchronized code using 
something like the double check idiom.
# an old [opensymphony patch|http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/OGNL-101] 
which, if I recall correctly, uses concurrent version of the map implementation.
It would be very interesting to compare this 3 different approaches. Before 
that, I think we would need a performance test bench.
  
> Performance - Replace synchronized blocks with ReentrantReadWriteLock
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OGNL-20
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-20
>             Project: OGNL
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>         Environment: ALL
>            Reporter: Greg Lively
>
> I've noticed a lot of synchronized blocks of code in OGNL. For the most part, 
> these synchronized blocks are controlling access to HashMaps, etc. I believe 
> this could be done far better using ReentrantReadWriteLocks. 
> ReentrantReadWriteLock allows unlimited concurrent access, and single threads 
> only for writes. Perfect in an environment where the ratio of reads  is far 
> higher than writes; which is typically the scenario for caching. Plus the 
> access control can be tuned for reads and writes; not just a big 
> synchronized{} wrapping a bunch of code.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to