[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-36?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13141250#comment-13141250
]
Maurizio Cucchiara commented on OGNL-36:
----------------------------------------
I (ab)used the commons prefix to distinguish the [old ognl
benchmark|http://commons.apache.org/ognl/benchmark-commons-ognl.html] from the
[commons one|http://commons.apache.org/ognl/benchmark-commons-ognl.html].
Furthermore, to make more complex what is already enough, there are even:
#
http://commons.apache.org/ognl/org.apache.commons.ognl.performance.PerformanceCommonsOgnlTest.html
#
http://commons.apache.org/ognl/org.apache.commons.ognl.performance.PerformanceOldOgnlTest.html
But I'm not happy with the way they represent the difference between the old
and the common approach.
What is the best way to show the performance increment?
> Link "Benchmarks" on left hand navigation is broken
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OGNL-36
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OGNL-36
> Project: OGNL
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Adrian Cumiskey
> Assignee: Maurizio Cucchiara
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: patch-OGNL36.txt
>
>
> The forrest file src/site/xdoc/benchmark-ognl.xml is missing causing a broken
> link to "Benchmarks" on the left hand navigation of the OGNL homepage.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
