[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13144256#comment-13144256
]
Sébastien Brisard commented on MATH-699:
----------------------------------------
h4. Should this be considered as an error?
Please have a look to lines
[103-108|http://commons.apache.org/math/xref/org/apache/commons/math/distribution/AbstractContinuousDistribution.html#103]
of {{AbstractContinuousDistribution}}.
I think the logics is flawed, I have the feeling that
{{rootFindingFunction.value(lowerBound)}} should be compared with
{{solver.getFunctionValueAccuracy()}}, and not with
{{getSolverAbsoluteAccuracy()}}. The problem is that
{{AbstractContinuousDistribution}} should then have a method called
{{getSolverFunctionValueAccuracy()}}. Should I add one?
Thanks for your comments,
Sébastien
> inverseCumulativeDistribution fails with cumulative distribution having a
> plateau
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-699
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-699
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Sébastien Brisard
> Assignee: Sébastien Brisard
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: AbstractContinuousDistributionTest.java
>
>
> This bug report follows MATH-692. The attached unit test fails. As required
> by the definition in MATH-692, the lower-bound of the interval on which the
> cdf is constant should be returned. This is not so at the moment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
