[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-699?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13147315#comment-13147315
]
Christian Winter commented on MATH-699:
---------------------------------------
The Javadoc of {{getSupportLowerBound()}}/{{getSupportUpperBound()}} in fact
needs to be sharpened. I didn't see this before. If I didn't overlook anything,
all current implementations already return the best bounds.
Regarding the bracketing issue there are now several ideas (thanks for the
Chebyshev idea, Phil). But I don't have a preference for a particular solution
which can be built from these ideas. Thus, Sébastien, just choose a strategy
which you consider to be beneficial.
> inverseCumulativeDistribution fails with cumulative distribution having a
> plateau
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MATH-699
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-699
> Project: Commons Math
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: Sébastien Brisard
> Assignee: Sébastien Brisard
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: AbstractContinuousDistributionTest.java
>
>
> This bug report follows MATH-692. The attached unit test fails. As required
> by the definition in MATH-692, the lower-bound of the interval on which the
> cdf is constant should be returned. This is not so at the moment.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
