[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13155160#comment-13155160
]
Joerg Schaible commented on LANG-778:
-------------------------------------
bq. is it really neccessary?
There is nothing to get the byte representation of a UUID.
UUID.toString.getBytes() is the binary representation of the string (48 bytes)
and not of the UUID (16 bytes).
UUID.nameUUIDFromBytes() creates a type-3 UUID using the provided bytes as
namespace. It does *not* create directly a UUID from the given bytes.
> Add UUIDUtils.toByteArray and UUIDUtils.fromByteArray
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-778
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-778
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: lang.*
> Reporter: Joerg Schaible
> Assignee: Joerg Schaible
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LANG-778.diff
>
> Original Estimate: 4h
> Remaining Estimate: 4h
>
> A UUID represents 16 bytes. In some situation (e.g. using DBs that do not
> have native support for the type UUID) it is necessary to use directly the
> bytes. The JDK does not support the transformation from UUID to bytes and
> back, therefore I'd like to add UUIDUtils with the two proposed methods.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
