[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13156555#comment-13156555
]
Henri Yandell commented on LANG-769:
------------------------------------
Fair point on the without warning - they were removed from 3.0 before 2.5 was
released, but that wasn't how it subsequently looks. Should have been
deprecated in 2.5 and 2.6 along with the other removed items.
The reason for removing is that there is no clear criteria as to which
semantically rich description should be there and which shouldn't. Too many
exception implementations without much value.
> Please restore NotImplementedException and UnhandledException
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LANG-769
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LANG-769
> Project: Commons Lang
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: david cogen
> Priority: Minor
>
> Why were these removed? I found these very useful and used them often. As the
> version 2.6 api javadoc states, "This exception supplements the standard
> exception classes by providing a more semantically rich description of the
> problem."
> Just want you to realize that these have found direct use outside the
> library; not just internal use within commons-lang.
> I will define these missing classes myself, or maybe include both
> commons-lang and commons-lang3 (but I really don't to do that). It would be
> very nice to have these back.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
